1.	
       
Overall Rating
		( Required, Visible To Authors )
		  
Multiple Choice
Strong Accept
Accept
Neutral
Reject
Strong Reject
2.     
       
Reviewer's confidence
		( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
		  
Multiple Choice
Expert
Confident
Reasonably confident
Not confident
3.  
       
Novelty (for revised workshop papers: novelty prior to the VAKD'09 workshop)
	     ( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
	       
Multiple Choice
Very original
Moderately original
Minor originality
Has been done before
4.  
       
Importance and relevance to the topic of the special issue
	       ( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
		 
Multiple Choice
Of broad interest
Of sufficient interest
Of limited interest
Irrelevant or out of scope
5.	   
       
Reference to prior work
	     ( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
	       
Multiple Choice
Excellent reference to prior work
References adequate
References missing
Does not cite relevant work
6.   
       
Clarity of presentation
	   ( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
	     
Multiple Choice
Reads very well
Is clear enough
Difficult to read
Unreadable
7.	
       
Technical correctness
		( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
		  
Multiple Choice
Definitely correct
Probably correct, did not check completely
Contains minor errors
Has major problems
8.  
       
Does the paper discuss the IEEE VAST 2008 challenge?
	 ( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
	   
Multiple Choice
The paper is about the challenge
Contains substantial discussion about the challenge
Challenge is briefly discussed
Challenge not mentioned
9.	  
       
If the paper would be accepted: would you require some changes to it before publication?
       ( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
	 
Multiple Choice
No changes needed, the paper could be published as it is.
Minor changes would be needed (explain the required changes in the comments).
Major changes would be needed (paper would essentially have to be rewritten).
10.   
       
Detailed Comments
		( Required, Visible To Authors, Visible To Authors During Feedback )
		  
Comment
11.	
       
Comments to Editors
	    ( Optional )
	      
Comment